![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Observations in Vegetable Fields With and Without Line-of-Sight Exposure to 5G within First Year of Introduction
Patricia A. ORMSBY
Abstract
This report presents a passive comparison of biodiversity and agricultural conditions between an area with direct exposure to beam-formed transmissions from fifth-generation mobile communications system (5G) antennas and an area without direct exposure, both temporally (2023 without transmissions versus 2024 with transmissions) and spatially (exposed expanse of fields versus fields sheltered by houses and satoyama groves in 2024). Though other factors existed that could impact biodiversity, clear differences could be identified in many species and crops in the comparisons made. These were particularly notable in voles, moderately large frogs, dragonflies and butterflies, with body sizes similar to one of the newly introduced 5G transmission wavelengths of 6.6 cm. Very small flying insects such as mosquitoes, flies and aphids also appeared to be impacted by the newly introduced 5G transmissions as did crop yield (pollination and other causes) and plant viability. Particularly affected crops included nightshades and cucurbits, especially in elevated locations, such as on trellises. There was a tendency to grow strongly, start bearing fruit and then wither before the fruit could mature. Some other crops such as legumes and sweet potatoes benefitted, seemingly from decreased numbers of rodent and insect pests. Since coherence of radiofrequency transmissions has been noted before as an important factor in the severity of effects from radiofrequency radiation, the satoyama environment, with its patchwork of groves, noted before for promoting biodiversity, may provide some protection by blocking direct exposure to beam-formed microwave transmissions in certain areas. The possibility should be investigated that this is a result of decreased coherence of the radiation that penetrates. Shielding of plants by dense foliage of other plants in the irradiated area appeared to improve crop yield and plant viability. The author recommends taking these observations into account when siting radiating infrastructure to preserve biodiversity and viability of small-scale mixed-crop gardening, which contributes important nutrition to the human diet.
Key words: coherence, dragonflies, fifth-generation mobile communications system (5G), frogs, radiofrequency radiation, satoyama, vegetable gardening, voles
no subject
Date: 2025-01-01 07:19 am (UTC)I will post a link to the full report with photos, tables and figures after I figure out how to upload it. In the meantime I can send a pdf to anyone requesting it.
I will post updates on the situation and respond to comments here. Two points worth mentioning now:
1) The dusky thrushes (Turdus eunomus), a formerly prominent winter species throughout Japan from October to early May, failed to show up this year, except one pair I encounter occasionally that keeps to the satoyama groves (it was always an open-land rice paddy forager).
2) The enormous sweet potatoes we harvested from the directly exposed field turned out to be rotten on the inside. I don't know whether the commercial operator next to our field had the same result--they only send around hired help.
effects on food production
Date: 2025-01-06 03:59 am (UTC)This is sobering news.
Can you sue for loss of self-sufficiency? Only half joking.
Re: effects on food production
Date: 2025-01-10 07:04 am (UTC)https://len2.web.fc2.com/pdf/observationsinveg.pdf
Actually, there is an initiative to sue the representatives of companies and government agencies for personal liability based on commercial law rather than criminal law. The "In Power Movement" is doing this. We are leery of it in Japan, where there is reason to think it would backfire over time, but they are addressing coercive imposition of harmful techologies such as smart meters, 5G and mandatory vaxes. https://www.inpowermovement.org/
Re: effects on food production
Date: 2025-01-10 10:30 am (UTC)Power to them.
Here in AU I don't know if is even possible to install domestic solar systems without the "smart" meter.
Re: effects on food production
Date: 2025-01-12 06:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-01-10 07:33 am (UTC)The averages turned out to be: 30.657 for the high and 22.657 for the low in 2024
Versus 30.819 for the high and 22.514 for the low in 2023. Thus just barely hotter highs in and barely cooler lows in 2023.I.e., no difference to speak of. Highs of 35 degrees were reached four times n July and nine times in August 2023. Highs of 35 or 36 were reached eight times in July and three times in August 2024, so it was slightly hotter somewhat earlier in 2024. None of the temperatures in themselves were record-breaking, just prolonged, but to the same degree each year.
Thus it seems unlikely that the heat caused all of the differences I saw between 2023 and 2024 at this location. Aftereffects of 2023's heat are a possibility, but that seemed to be favoring most of the creatures I observed in 2023.